CRENSHAW

v.

LEEKE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Scoggins v. State, 691 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)
  …ral courts and those state courts that have held that a trial judge should not inquire into the numerical division of the jury. See State v. Roberts, 131 Ariz. 513, 642 P. 2d 858 (1982); State v. Rickerson, 95 N.M. 666, 625 P. 2d 1183, cert. denied, 454 U.S. 845, 102 S.Ct. 161, 70 L.Ed.2d 132 (1981); People v. Wilson, 390 Mich. 689, 213 N.W. 2d 193 (1973); State v. Hutchins, 43 N.J. 85, 202 A. 2d 678 (1964). For whatever reason, whether to gauge the time for an evening recess or to decide whether to give…
• McCABE v. Arvon J. Arave, 827 F.2d 634 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …ess distinction). Reversal is required, however, only if the error affected the substantial rights of the parties or is “inconsistent with substantial justice.” See Powell v. Levit, 640 F. 2d 239, 241 (9th Cir.) (section 1983 action), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 845, 102 S.Ct. 160, 70 L.Ed.2d 131 (1981). A review of the record indicates that the videotapes were cumulative. Lake had already testified to the events depicted in the tapes. There was no reversible error. IV. Motion for Sanctions and Contempt We are…
• Fenner v. Dependable Trucking Co., Inc., 716 F.2d 598 (9th Cir. 1983)
  …(d)(2). “[T]he erroneous admission of evidence is harmless unless it affects ‘the substantial rights of the parties’ or is ‘inconsistent with substantial justice.’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 61.” Powell v. Levit, 640 F. 2d 239, 241 (9th Cir.), cert. [*604] denied 454 U.S. 845, 102 S.Ct. 160, 70 L.Ed.2d 131 (1981) (citations omitted). Hit-tie’s testimony presented the jury with the only eyewitness account of the speed of Dependable’s truck. Thus, its potentially prejudicial effect is substantial. Dependable and Ralphs ra…