PARIS ET AL.

v.

PROFIT SHARING PLAN OF HOWARD B. WOLF, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• Ortega v. Post-Newsweek Stations, 510 So. 2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …is story is a fair and substantially accurate portrayal of the events in question”), or told to him by FDLE personnel from information in the FDLE files upon which he was entitled to rely, Medico v. Time, Inc., 643 F. 2d 134 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 836, 102 S.Ct. 139, 70 L.Ed.2d 116 (1981). In Medico, the Third Circuit held that fair and accurate reports of FBI materials not released to the public were privileged. The court determined that even though the materials were not public records, the rep…
• Dennard v. The Richards Grp., Inc., 681 F.2d 306 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …ppeal, in reviewing the actions of administrators of an employee benefit plan, utilize an “arbitrary and capricious” standard of review. Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B. Wolf, Inc., 637 F. 2d 357, 362 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836, 102 S.Ct. 140, 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981); Bayles v. Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, 602 F. 2d 97, 99 & 100 n.3 (5th Cir. 1979). “According to the clear weight of federal authority, the actions of the trustees in the administ…
• Degan v. Ford Motor Co. & the Int'l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am., AFL-CIO, 869 F.2d 889 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …on or after January 1, 1975. Our previous cases have fashioned a rule of interpretation for this exception as well. In Paris v. Profit Sharing Plan for Employees of Howard B. Wolf, Inc., 637 F. 2d 357, 361 (5th Cir. Unit A Feb. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 836, 102 S.Ct. 140, 70 L.Ed.2d 117 (1981), we held that “a cause of action does not become a presently enforceable demand until a claim is denied____ [Thus], for purposes of ERISA a cause of action does not accrue until an application is denied.” [*895]…