TEXAS ET AL.

v.

CERTAIN NAMED AND UNNAMED UNDOCUMENTED ALIEN CHILDREN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Lugar v. Edmondson OIL Co., Inc., 457 U.S. 922 (U.S. 1982)
  …elements was present here, the complaint failed to allege conduct under color of state law. Because this construction of the under-color-of-state-law requirement appears to be inconsistent with prior decisions of this Court, we granted certiorari. 452 U. S. 937 (1981). II Although the Court of Appeals correctly perceived the importance of Flagg Brothers to a proper resolution of this case, [*927] it misread that case.6 It also failed to give sufficient weight to that line of cases, beginning with Sniadac…
• Plyler v. DOE, 457 U.S. 202 (U.S. 1982)
  …was pending, the Court of Appeals rendered its decision in No. 80-1538. Apparently on the strength of that opinion, the Court of Appeals, on February 23,1981, summarily affirmed the decision of the Southern District. We noted probable jurisdiction, 452 U. S. 937 (1981), and consolidated this case with No. 80-1538 for briefing and argument.8 H-Í HH The Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[njo State shall . . . deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any per…
• Am. Tobacco Co. v. Patterson, 456 U.S. 63 (U.S. 1982)
  …t of Appeals in this case, however, held that § 703(h) does not apply to seniority systems adopted after the effective date of the Civil Rights Act.1 We granted the petition for certiorari to address the validity of this construction of the section. 452 U. S. 937 (1982). H-I Petitioner American Tobacco Co. operates two plants m Richmond, Va., one which manufactures cigarettes and one which manufactures pipe tobacco. Each plant is divided into a prefabrication department, which blends and prepares tobacco f…