NICOLADZE

v.

UNITED STATES; SCHWEIKER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES V. HANSEN; BAUER V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; DOUTHIT V. ESTELLE, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR; HORNICK V. NOYES ET AL., IN RE PIATT

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Weiss, 930 F.2d 185 (2d Cir. 1991)
  …her such manual, the Claims Manual (produced by the Social Security Administration), “[i]t has no legal force, and does not bind” the Secretary. Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789, 101 S.Ct. 1468, 1471, 67 L.Ed.2d 685 (per curiam), reh’g denied, 451 U.S. 1032, 101 S.Ct. 3023, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981). No more can it bind Weiss in filling out government forms for false statement purposes. Box 31 of Form 1500 required Weiss to put down the corporation’s address. If what Weiss inserted was literally true, th…
• Falicha Adams v. United States Dep't OF Hous. & Urban Dev., 807 F.2d 318 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …t an administrative claim to ensure that the jurisdictional prerequisite to suit is properly laid). Thus, a finding of estoppel would have been improper. See Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 788, 101 S.Ct. 1468, 1470, 67 L.Ed.2d 685, reh’g denied, 451 U.S. 1032, 101 S.Ct. 3023, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981); Chu v. Schweiker, 690 F. 2d 330, 334 (2d Cir. 1982); United States v. RePass, 688 F. 2d 154, 158 (2d Cir.1982). We conclude that Adams’s claim for damages for the loss of Falicha’s services was properly dismi…
• Wolchuck v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., 871 F.2d 869 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …20 C.F.R. § 404.339 (1988). It is well settled that the filing of an application is a prerequisite to entitlement to benefits under the Social Security Act. Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 790, 101 S.Ct. 1468, 1471, 67 L.Ed.2d 685, reh’g denied, 451 U.S. 1032, 101 S.Ct. 3023, 69 L.Ed.2d 401 (1981). However, under 20 C.F.R. section 404.630, the filing date of an earlier written statement filed with HHS will be used as the filing date of a subsequently filed application if the earlier statement indicates a…