CODA

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• Connecticut v. Johnson, 460 U.S. 73 (U.S. 1983)
  …l instruction. Id., at 176, 440 A. 2d, at 865. The court did not discuss the State’s argument that the Sandstrom violation was harmless, seemingly relying on its recent decision in State v. Truppi, 182 Conn. 449, 438 A. 2d 712 (1980), cert, denied, 451 U. S. 941 (1981).9 In its petition for certiorari, the State claimed that the Sandstrom error should have been analyzed for harmlessness under Chapman v. California, 386 U. S. 18 (1967).10 I — I I — I A In Chapman, this Court noted that “there are some con…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …s not entitled to such protection where its contents were easily discernible by feeling the outside of the bag. United States v. Ocampo, 650 F. 2d 421 (2d Cir. 1981). See also United States v. Delos-Rios, 642 F. 2d 42, 461 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941, 101 S.Ct. 2024, 68 L.Ed.2d 330, 451 U.S. 941, 101 S.Ct. 2025, 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981) (no legitimate expectation of privacy in partially open paper bag). On the other hand, we have recognized a protected expectation of privacy in a securely taped p…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Porter, 764 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1985)
  …ion to show that Baker was predisposed to commit the crime and that the government agents did not induce him to do so. Thus, this did not constitute a prejudicial variance. Cf., United States v. Scanlon, 640 F. 2d 144 (8th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 941, 101 S.Ct. 2025, 68 L.Ed.2d 330 (1981). Furthermore, there was no impermissible “spillover” of evidence in this case. The government did not and could not link Hearn to other conspiracies beyond that charged in the indictment because, as we stated…