FORE
v.
VIRGINIA
FORE
VIRGINIA
449 U.S. 1017
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sweetwine v. State OF Md. & the Warden of the Md. House of Corr., 769 F.2d 991 (4th Cir. 1985)…ate courts have previously held that armed robbery and simple robbery are distinct offenses for sentencing purposes. Sweetwine v. State, 42 Md.App. 1, 8, 398 A. 2d 1262, 1267 (1979), aff’d, 288 Md. 199, 201 n. 1, 421 A. 2d 60, 61 n. 1, cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1017, 101 S.Ct. 579, 66 L.Ed.2d 477 (1980); see Bynum v. State, 277 Md. 703, 707, 357 A. 2d 339, 341, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 899, 97 S.Ct. 264, 50 L.Ed.2d 183 (1976). . We have considered Sweetwine’s motion for testimony in abstentia filed on the day of…