INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, CLC, ET AL.

v.

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Lehman v. Nakshian, 453 U.S. 156 (U.S. 1981)
  …e suits was added only to resolve a conflict in the Courts of Appeals on that issue and to confirm the correctness of this Court's decision in the Lorillard case. We granted certiorari to consider the issue presented. Sub nom. Hildalgo v. Nakshian, 449 U. S. 1009. II It has long been settled that the Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury does not apply in actions against the Federal Government. In Galloway v. United States, 319 U. S. 372, 388-389, the Court observed (footnotes omitted): “The suit is on…
• N. Haven Bd. of Educ. v. Bell, 456 U.S. 512 (U.S. 1982)
  …the Eighth Circuit considered HEW’s arguments but “adopted” the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit’s decision in Islesboro. And in Seattle University v. HEW, 621 F. 2d 992, 993, cert. granted sub nom. United States Dept. of Ed. v. Seattle Univ., 449 U. S. 1009 (1980), the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit followed the three earlier Circuit decisions, noting that each of those courts had held that the plain language of Title IX did not support HEW’s position. Even in the decision below, in which the C…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. 57 (U.S. 1981)
  …an, acting in his capacity as Circuit Justice for the Third Circuit, stayed the District Court’s order enjoining commencement of registration. 448 U. S. 1306. Registration began the next Monday. On December 1, 1980, we noted probable jurisdiction. 449 U. S. 1009. II Whenever called upon to judge the constitutionality of an Act of Congress -“the gravest and) most delicate duty that this Court is called upon to perform,” Blodgett v. Holden, 275 U. S. 142, 148 (1927) (Holmes, J.) — the Court accords “great w…