METROMEDIA, INC., ET AL.

v.

CITY OF SAN DIEGO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Metromedia, Inc. v. City OF SAN Diego, 453 U.S. 490 (U.S. 1981)
  …g that the ordinance was facially invalid on First Amendment grounds and that the city’s threatened destruction of the outdoor advertising business was prohibited by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. We noted probable jurisdiction. 449 U. S. 897. II Early cases in this Court sustaining regulation of and prohibitions aimed at billboards did not involve First Amendment considerations. See Packer Corp. v. Utah, 285 U. S. 105 (1932); St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. St. Louis, 249 U. S. 26…
• Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (U.S. 1981)
  …nder an ordinance prohibiting all live entertainment, including nonob-scene, nude dancing, violated their rights of free expression guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution.4 We noted probable jurisdiction, 449 U. S. 897 (1980), and now set aside appellants’ convictions. I As the Mount Ephraim Code has been construed by the New Jersey courts — a construction that is binding upon us — “live entertainment,” including nude dancing, is “not a permitted use in any est…