SCARBOROUGH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Buckhanon v. Percy, 708 F.2d 1209 (7th Cir. 1983)
  …notices were open to reconsideration. Moreover, the law in this circuit on the contents of the notice required in such circumstances is both well settled and rather thoroughly elaborated. See Dilda v. Quern, 612 F. 2d 1055 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 935, 100 S.Ct. 3039, 65 L.Ed.2d 1130 (1980); Banks v. Trainor, 525 F. 2d 837 (7th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 978, 96 S.Ct. 1484, 47 L.Ed.2d 748 (1976); Vargas v. Trainor, 508 F. 2d 485 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1008, 95 S.Ct. 1454, 4…
• Bennett v. White, 865 F.2d 1395 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …did not order such disclosure in the notice. Ortiz v. Eichler did more than merely affirm the district court’s exercise of discretion in fashioning a decree. The opinion cites approvingly Dilda v. Quern, 612 F. 2d 1055, 1057 (7th Cir.) (per curiam), 447 U.S. 935, 100 S.Ct. 3039, 65 L.Ed.2d 1130 (1980), which holds that the failure of the court to include the state agency’s calculations in an AFDC benefits termination notice violates procedural due process. Thus Ortiz v. Eichler controls with respect to the…
• Foggs v. Block, 722 F.2d 933 (1st Cir. 1983)
  …Welfare Rights Organization v. O’Bannon, 525 F.Supp. 1055 (E.D.Pa.1981), the court did not go as far as have other courts in requiring specific notice, see, e.g., Dilda v. Quern, 612 F. 2d 1055 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., Miller v. Dilda, 447 U.S. 935, 100 S.Ct. 3039, 65 L.Ed.2d 1130 (1980) (State agency implementing benefit reduction required to supply each A.F.D.C. recipient with a copy of the agency worksheet used to recalculate recipient’s benefits). In addition to finding the notice unconst…