CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (87 total)

• Telecomms. Research & Action Ctr. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n & United States, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984)
  …cemeal appeals.” Association of National Advertisers v. FTC (“National Advertisers”), 627 F. 2d 1151, 1156 (D.C.Cir.1979) (Tamm, J.) (citing McKart v. United States, 395 U.S. 185, 193-94, 89 S.Ct. 1657, 1662-63, 23 L.Ed.2d 194 (1969)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 921, 100 S.Ct. 3011, 65 L.Ed.2d 1113 (1980). Accordingly, we have found the threshold a litigant must pass to obtain judicial review of ongoing agency proceedings to be a high one. Id. As Judge Leventhal emphasized in National Advertisers, “[ojnly in…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Howard "Sonny" Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …olumbus 7 10 + 3 Macon 14 10 -4 Thomasville 4 5 + 1 Valdosta _4 _5 + 1 45 45 The disparity figures for a 23-person grand jury panel would be approximately half those indicated in the last column above. . 609 F. 2d 183 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 921, 100 S.Ct. 3010, 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980). . Id. at 191. See also United States v. Foxworth, 599 F. 2d 1, 4 (1st Cir. 1979). . 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1973 et seq. . 42 u.S.C.A. § 1973e(d)(2) (emphasis supplied). . United States v. Ramirez, 622 F. 2d 898,…
• McCARTHY v. Madigan, 503 U.S. 140 (U.S. 1992)
  …minating with the Attorney General “would be to demand a futile act”); Association of National Advertisers, Inc. v. FTC, 201 U. S. App. D. C. 165, 170-171, 627 F. 2d 1151, 1156-1157 (1979) (bias of Federal Trade Commission chairman), cert. denied, 447 U. S. 921 (1980). See also Patsy v. Florida International University, [*149] 634 F. 2d 900, 912-913 (CA6 1981) (en banc) (administrative procedures must “not be used to harass or otherwise discourage those with legitimate claims”), rev’d on other grounds sub…