NOLAN
v.
MARYLAND
NOLAN
MARYLAND
446 U.S. 966
Supreme Court of the United States (1980)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 33 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (31 total)
-
Kremer v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1982)…s reviewing state agency determinations. Smouse v. General Electric Co., 626 F. 2d 333 (CA3 1980) (per curiam); Unger v. Consolidated Foods Corp., 657 F. 2d 909 (CA7 1981); Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F. 2d 1079 (CA8), cert. denied, 446 U. S. 966 (1980). The Fourth Circuit has held that issues decided in a de nemo state judicial proceeding are not subject to redetermination in a subsequent Title VII action. Moosavi v. Fairfax County Board of Education, 666 F. 2d 68 (1981). In the Act of May…1 / 2
-
United States v. Houshang Sheikh, 654 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1981)…s clearance and delivery of the foreign package to the consignee. For all practical purposes, the package reached the end of a “nonstop” flight when it arrived at DFW. See United States v. King, 517 F. 2d 350, 354, n.2 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 2943, 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980). See also United States v. Gallagher, 557 F. 2d 1041, 1044 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 870, 98 S.Ct. 213, 54 L.Ed.2d 148 (1977).13 Thus, the warrantless customs inspection— made at the functional e…
-
United States v. Richards, 638 F.2d 765 (5th Cir. 1981)…t 629. The Court found no historical or constitutional reason for treating mail differently from persons or vehicles entering the country. See also United States v. King, 517 F. 2d 350 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied sub nom. Pearson v. United States, 446 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 2943, 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980) (approving a search of mail that was made prior to delivery to the addressee at an inland post office). Extending the doctrine of Ramsey and King, we see no reason to prohibit an extended border search of inte…
Previewing 3 of 31 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence