IOWA STATE MEN'S REFORMATORY ET AL.

v.

GUNTHER

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Kremer v. Chem. Constr. Corp., 456 U.S. 461 (U.S. 1982)
  …ond Circuit. In addition to Unger, see Smouse v. General Electric Co., 626 F. 2d 333, 336 (CA3 1980) (expressly rejecting [*487] Sinicropi); Gunther v. Iowa State Men’s Reformatory, 612 F. 2d 1079, 1084 (CA8) (“questioning” Sinicropi), cert. denied, 446 U. S. 966 (1980). See also Aleem v. General Felt Industries, Inc., 661 F. 2d 135, 137 (CA9 1981) (“Sinicropi is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Alexander [v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U. S. 36 (1974)]”). Commentators, too, agree that the Seco…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Houshang Sheikh, 654 F.2d 1057 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …s clearance and delivery of the foreign package to the consignee. For all practical purposes, the package reached the end of a “nonstop” flight when it arrived at DFW. See United States v. King, 517 F. 2d 350, 354, n.2 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 2943, 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980). See also United States v. Gallagher, 557 F. 2d 1041, 1044 (4th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 870, 98 S.Ct. 213, 54 L.Ed.2d 148 (1977).13 Thus, the warrantless customs inspection— made at the functional e…
• United States v. Richards, 638 F.2d 765 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …t 629. The Court found no historical or constitutional reason for treating mail differently from persons or vehicles entering the country. See also United States v. King, 517 F. 2d 350 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied sub nom. Pearson v. United States, 446 U.S. 966, 100 S.Ct. 2943, 64 L.Ed.2d 825 (1980) (approving a search of mail that was made prior to delivery to the addressee at an inland post office). Extending the doctrine of Ramsey and King, we see no reason to prohibit an extended border search of inte…