AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
HABERSIN CAMERA SHOPS, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1968-04-23
No. 68-174
Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SWANN, JJ.
209 So. 2d 283 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is a certificate under Rule 4.6, Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A., from the Circuit Court of Dade County, sitting as an appellate court, in an appeal from a small claims court. We do not think the question certified is properly before this court. The circuit court has final appellate jurisdiction of all cases arising in the small claims court. Therefore, the question is hereby denied. Jaworski v. City of Opa-Locka, Fla.1963, 149 So.2d 33.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Miller, 220 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
    …luded that the box constituted a dangerous condition, the jury likewise could have concluded that the plaintiff was not contributorily negligent in failing to see the box. Compare McHargue v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 283. The case relied on by the defendant, Frederich’s Market, Inc. v. Knox, Fla.1953, 66 So. 2d 251, is sufficiently distinguishable on its facts that it is not controlling. In our opinion the trial court committed no error in denying the motion for di…
  • Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Burse, 229 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)
    …be drawn, thus presenting a jury question, and that appellant has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that the trial judge erred in denying the motion for directed verdict. McHargue v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc., Fla.App.1968, 209 So. 2d 283. Accordingly, we find no error and therefore, Affirm. WALDEN and McCAIN, JJ., and GONZALEZ, JOSE A., Associate Judge, concur.…
  • State v. Gonzales, 354 So. 2d 949 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
    …Rule 4.6, F.A.R. by the Circuit Court of Alachua County, sitting as an appellate court, in an appeal from a county court. The rule does not provide for certification under these circumstances. American Express Company v. Habersin Camera Shops, Inc., 209 So. 2d 283 (3d DCA 1968). The question certified is not properly before us and is hereby DENIED. SMITH, Acting C. J., and ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., concur.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw