METRO BROADCASTING CO., INC.
v.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY OF PUERTO RICO; STEWART V. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND; PAYNE V. CALIFORNIA; DIXON V. UNITED STATES; THIESS V. FRANKLIN SQUARE HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.; MOONEY V. GEORGIA; PITCHFORD V. SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS; AIR FREIGHT HAULAGE CO., INC. V. RYD-AIR, INC., ET AL.; COUNTRYMAN V. TEXAS ET AL.; RIVERA V. CRUZ ET AL.; ERNEST V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; SHEEDY V. UNITED STATES; ERNEST V. SIRICA, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.; BRIDGER V. ARKANSAS; SAYLES V. SHUKER, JUDGE, ET AL.; SANDERS ET AL. V. HANKINS ET AL.; JACKSON V. FLORIDA; SALVATORE V. FLORIDA; WEAVER V. UNITED STATES; WILLIS V. GEORGIA; POSTELL V. TEXAS; GASKINS V. ASHE, SHERIFF, ET AL.; W. D. V. ILLINOIS
METRO BROADCASTING CO., INC.
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY OF PUERTO RICO; STEWART V. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND; PAYNE V. CALIFORNIA; DIXON V. UNITED STATES; THIESS V. FRANKLIN SQUARE HOSPITAL, INC., ET AL.; MOONEY V. GEORGIA; PITCHFORD V. SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS; AIR FREIGHT HAULAGE CO., INC. V. RYD-AIR, INC., ET AL.; COUNTRYMAN V. TEXAS ET AL.; RIVERA V. CRUZ ET AL.; ERNEST V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT; SHUFFMAN, EXECUTRIX V. HARTFORD TEXTILE CORP. ET AL.; SHEEDY V. UNITED STATES; ERNEST V. SIRICA, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, ET AL.; BRIDGER V. ARKANSAS; SAYLES V. SHUKER, JUDGE, ET AL.; SANDERS ET AL. V. HANKINS ET AL.; JACKSON V. FLORIDA; SALVATORE V. FLORIDA; WEAVER V. UNITED STATES; WILLIS V. GEORGIA; POSTELL V. TEXAS; GASKINS V. ASHE, SHERIFF, ET AL.; W. D. V. ILLINOIS
444 U.S. 975
Supreme Court of the United States (1979)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 468 So. 2d 510 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)…testimony complained of meets this standard. The trial court did not abuse its wide discretion in denying the motion for mistrial. See Salvatore v. State, 366 So. 2d 745 (Fla.1978), cert. den. 444 U.S. 885, 100 S.Ct. 177, 62 L.Ed.2d 115, reh. den. 444 U.S. 975, 100 S.Ct. 474, 62 L.Ed.2d 393 (1979). AFFIRMED. NIMMONS, J., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.…
-
Armstrong v. Clovis McALPIN, 625 F.2d 433 (2d Cir. 1980)…ir. 1979) (order denying disqualification reversed); Armstrong v. McAlpin, 606 F. 2d 28 (2d Cir. 1979) (order denying disqualification reversed); In re Hartford Textile Corp., 588 F. 2d 872 (2d Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (order affirmed), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 975, 100 S.Ct. 473, 62 L.Ed.2d 392 (1979); Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 567 F. 2d 225 (2d Cir. 1977) (order reversed); Allegaert v. Perot, 565 F. 2d 246 (2d Cir. 1977) (order affirmed); SEC v. Sloan, 535 F. 2d 679 (2d Cir. 1976) (per cu…
-
Douglas v. Louie L. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir. 1983)…ts of prior criminal activity combined did not rise to the level of a “significant history of prior criminal activity.” Salvatore v. State, 366 So. 2d 745, 748, 752 (Fla. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 885, 100 S.Ct. 177, 62 L.Ed.2d 115, reh. denied, 444 U.S. 975, 100 S.Ct. 474, 62 L.Ed.2d 393 (1979). Cf. Smith v. State, 407 So. 2d 894, 900-01 (Fla.1981) (confessions to “various” crimes constituted significant history); Ruffin [*1550] v. State, 397 So. 2d 277, 283 (Fla. 1981) (previous murder is significan…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence