NICKERSON

v.

CITY OF NORFOLK

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• BIG Horn Coal Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 852 F.2d 1259 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …ce within a specified time. See, e.g., Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 594 F. 2d 129, 135-39 (5th Cir.) (either party could terminate contract “at any time ‘with or without cause’ on ten days’ notice to the other party”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 938, 100 S.Ct. 288, 62 L.Ed.2d 198 (1979). In such a case the reason for invoking the provision is irrelevant. The reason may be purely a whim or caprice; all that matters is that proper notice is given. The rationale behind these cases is that the part…
• Grand Light & Supply Co., Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 771 F.2d 672 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …ntract. Zullo v. Smith, 179 Conn. 596, 601, 427 A. 2d 409, 412 (1980). The U.C.C. good faith provision may not be used to override explicit contractual terms. Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc., 594 F. 2d 129, 138 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 938, 100 S.Ct. 288, 62 L.Ed.2d 198 (1979). See also Triangle Mining Co. v. Stauffer Chemical Co., 753 F. 2d 734, 740 (9th Cir.1985) (absent special reliance or unequal bargaining power, clear termination provision renders motive behind termination irrel…
• Carter Equip. Co. v. John Deere Indus. Equip. Co., 681 F.2d 386 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …cknowledge that activity in conformance with the terms of the contract cannot amount to misconduct that constitutes a breach of a fiduciary duty. See generally Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration Co., Inc., 594 F. 2d 129 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 938, 100 S.Ct. 288, 62 L.Ed.2d 198 (1979). . Deere also complains that Carter failed to establish any causal link between Deere’s conduct and Carter’s financial losses. This complaint may be resolved upon remand by assuring that the instruction relatin…