MCCLAIN

v.

UNITED STATES; SIMPSON V. UNITED STATES; AND BRADSHAW V. UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Robinson, 690 F.2d 869 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …applicable to that issue, or (3) the prior decision was clearly erroneous and would work manifest injustice. EEOC v. International Longshoremen’s Association, 623 F. 2d at 1058; United States v. McClain, 593 F. 2d 658, 664 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 234, 62 L.Ed.2d 173 (1979); Morrow v. Dillard, 580 F. 2d 1284, 1292 (5th Cir. 1978); Schwartz v. NMS Industries, Inc., 575 F. 2d 553, 554-55 (5th Cir. 1978); White v. Murtha, 377 F. 2d 428, 431-32 (5th Cir. 1967). In our view, the first o…
• United States v. Cherry, 759 F.2d 1196 (5th Cir. 1985)
  …ry decision of the law applicable to such issues.’ ” Daly v. Sprague, 742 F. 2d 896, 900 (5th Cir.1984) (quoting White v. Murtha, 377 F. 2d 428, 431-32 (5th Cir. 1967)); see also United States v. McClain, 593 F. 2d 658, 664 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 234, 62 L.Ed.2d 173 (1979). Because we find that, in light of the recent Supreme Court case of Oregon v. Elstad, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1285, 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), our statement in Cherry I no longer reflects the current state of the law,…
• Henri and Mary Tatro v. The State OF Tex., 703 F.2d 823 (5th Cir. 1983)
  …injustice.” White v. Murtha, 377 F. 2d 428, 432 (5th Cir.1967) (footnote omitted; enumeration added); see Goodpasture, Inc. v. M/V Pollux, 688 F. 2d 1003, 1005-06 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. McClain, 593 F. 2d 658, 664 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 444 U.S. 918, 100 S.Ct. 234, 62 L.Ed.2d 173 (1979). None of these considerations justifies departure from Tatro I by this panel. Although we perhaps would have taken a different view of the EAHCA upon de novo consideration, we cannot say that the well-documente…