RUSH ET AL.

v.

SAVCHUK

Citator

Cited By

• Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (U.S. 1980)
  …al argument to the effect that the use of the prior conviction as a predicate for his prosecution under § 1202 (a)(1) violated his rights under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Because of conflict among the Courts of Appeals,4 we granted certiorari. 442 U. S. 939 (1979). [*59] II Four cases decided by this Court provide the focus for petitioner’s attack upon his conviction. The first, and pivotal one, is Gideon v. Wainwright, supra, where the Court held that a state felony conviction without counsel, and wi…
• Chapman v. Pickett, 801 F.2d 912 (7th Cir. 1986)
  …at the first amendment claim was barred by qualified immunity. The court reversed the finding that no actual damages had been shown. . On remand the district court determined that no eighth amendment violation existed in light of Rummel v. Estelle, 442 U.S. 939, 99 S.Ct. 2879, 61 L.Ed.2d 309 (1979). Chapman v. Pickett, 491 F.Supp. 967 (C.D.Ill.1980). This circuit reversed, ruling that Rummel did not apply to this case. Chapman v. Pickett, 645 F. 2d 73 (7th Cir.1980) (unpublished order). The court found tha…
• United States v. Lehning, 742 F.2d 1113 (7th Cir. 1984)
  …occurs when two or more persons agree to attempt to commit acts which include all the elements of a crime under that section and any overt act is done pursuant to the agreement.” United States v. Rose, 590 F. 2d 232, 235 (7th Cir.1978), cert denied, 442 U.S. 939, 99 S.Ct. 2859, 61 L.Ed.2d 297 (1979). The trial evidence clearly proved that the defendants agreed to rob the Trachtenberg Gallery and traveled to Merrillville on June 1 for that purpose. The defendants agreed that they would steal “five bronzes.…