GOFF

v.

HILTON, PRISON SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hughes, 626 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …e in declining to review Hughes’ contention that he should not have been convicted for [*627] permitting the remains of the horses to be processed into commercial products. United States v. Young Buffalo, 591 F. 2d 506, 513 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 950, 99 S.Ct. 2178, 60 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1979). VI. Finally, Hughes claims that the district judge refused to give an instruction on his theory of the case. His theory of defense was that BLM agents had authorized him to sell the horses. The controlling…
• United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1986)
  …ferences which are (a) rationally based on the perception of the witness and (b) helpful to a clear understanding of his testimony or the determination of a fact in issue.” United States v. Young Buffalo, 591 F. 2d 506, 513 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 950, 99 S.Ct. 2178, 60 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1979); United States v. Butcher, 557 F. 2d 666, 669-70 (9th Cir.1977). Such testimony is particularly valuable where, as in the present case, the lay witnesses are able to make the challenged identifications based…
• United States v. Deggendorf, 626 F.2d 47 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …ir. 1979).] We hold that the trial court’s failure to make a finding at the end of all the evidence did not constitute reversible error in this case. See United States v. Smith, supra; United States v. Morton, 591 F. 2d 483 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 950, 99 S.Ct. 2177, 60 L.Ed.2d 1054 (1979). At the same time, we suggest that diligent observance of the Bell procedures will avoid these recurring issues on appeal.7 V. Conclusion. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district cou…