MARTIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Thoreen, 653 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1981)
  …nappropriate to the particular role of the actor, be he judge, juror, party, witness, counsel or spectator.” United States v. Seale, 461 F. 2d 345, 366 (7th Cir.1972). See also, Gordon v. United States, 592 F. 2d 1215, 1218 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2011, 60 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979). Requiring adherence to these roles ensures “that a judicial proceeding [will be] confined to a rational search for truth in the context of defined legal issues.” Seale, supra, 461 F. 2d at 366-67. Contumacious…
• Harrison v. Owen, 682 F.2d 138 (7th Cir. 1982)
  …for the brutal and senseless slaying of a cab driver during a robbery. His conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Indiana, 269 Ind. 677, 382 N.E. 2d 920 (1978), and certiorari was denied by the United States Supreme Court on April 16, 1979. 441 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2010, 60 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979). I. The facts surrounding Harrison’s statements to the police are set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Indiana at 382 N.E. 2d 920, 922-24. As Harrison’s recitation of facts in his brief do not sign…
• United States v. Adelard Vachon, 869 F.2d 653 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …t has stated that if the court “decides to weather the storm of misconduct, such a decision does not negate the power to impose summary punishment at the end of the proceeding.” Gordon v. United States, 592 F. 2d 1215, 1218 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 912, 99 S.Ct. 2011, 60 L.Ed.2d 384 (1979). We can find nothing unreasonable or prejudicial here in the court’s having waited until the jury retired to impose a punishment for contempt (90 days imprisonment for each of the two incidents). Appellant re…