PEREZ-CRUZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Roberts, 427 So. 2d 787 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
• Alpha Otis O'Daniel Stephens v. Zant, 631 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …United States v. Brooks, 611 F. 2d 614, 619 (5th Cir. 1980). Only when the charge taken in its entirety fails to fairly present the issues to the jury will error be found. United States v. Chandler, 586 F. 2d 593, 606 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927, 99 S.Ct. 1262, 59 L.Ed.2d 483 (1979). In his charge to the jury, the trial judge instructed them that they were to consider all the evidence of the case, including evidence of mitigation and aggravation. He told the jury that unless one of the sta…
• United States v. Nance, 666 F.2d 353 (9th Cir. 1982)
  …ire an examination of the other three factors. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. at 531, 92 S.Ct. at 2192; United States v. Rich, [*361] 589 F. 2d 1025 (10th Cir. 1978); see United States v. Diaz-Alvarado, 587 F. 2d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 927, 99 S.Ct. 1261, 59 L.Ed.2d 482 (1979) (five month delay insufficient in itself to show violation of right). Even if we consider the other factors, the reason for the delay, as discussed in Part I supra, was largely the need to preserve continuity of…