THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,

v.

GODFREY K. NEWMAN, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• Havoco OF Am., Ltd. v. Hill, 790 So. 2d 1018 (Fla. 2001)
  …ly construed in the interest of the family home.” Milton, 58 So. at 719. A concomitant in harmony with this rule of liberal construction is the rule of strict construction as applied to the exceptions. See, e.g., Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Ins., Inc., 207 So. 2d 431, 432 (Fla.1968).5 Indeed, this strict construction of the exceptions proved paramount in our most recent inquiries into the homestead exemption in the context of civil and criminal forfeitures. THE FORFEITURE CASES In Butterworth v. Caggiano, 605…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Point E. ONE Condo. Corp., Inc. v. Point E. Developers, Inc., 348 So. 2d 32 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)
  …hat purpose. It does not invalidate the debt or the lien, but under certain circumstances, merely takes priority over the debt or lien. See, for example, Milton v. Milton, 63 Fla. 533, 58 So. 718 (1912), and Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Insurance, Inc., 207 So. 2d 431 (Fla.1968). We, therefore, do not reach the question of whether the lien is exempted from the constitutional prohibition by the method of its creation at the time of the purchase of the condominium. See Platt v. Platt, 50 Fla. 594, 39 So. 536 (1905)…
• AETNA Ins. Co. v. LaGASSE, 223 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1969)
  …, 152 Fla. 281, 10 So. 2d 807; Abernathy v. Gruppo, Fla.App.1960, 119 So. 2d 398. . Anemaet v. Martin-Senour Company, Fla.App.1959, 114 So. 2d 23. . Sec. 55.10, F.S., 1963, F.S.A. . Note 4, supra. . Quigley v. Kennedy & Ely Ins., Inc., Fla.1068, 207 So. 2d 431, 433. See also Milton v. Milton, 63 Ela. 533, 58 So. 718; Pasco v. Harley, note 4, supra. 26 Am.Jur., Homesteads, See. 101, p. 64. . Anemaet v. Martin-Senour Company, note 5, supra, 114 So. 2d, p. 27. . “For the reason that land held in remainder…