NORTH CAROLINA

v.

BUTLER

Citator

Cited By

• Stafford v. Briggs, 444 U.S. 527 (U.S. 1980)
  …tiorari in these cases to decide whether the venue provisions contained in § 2 of the Mandamus and Venue Act of 1962, 28 U. S. C. f 1391 (e), apply to actions [*530] for money damages brought against federal officials in their individual capacities. 439 U. S. 1113 (1979). I No. 77-1546 Stafford et al. v. Briggs et al. In 1972, petitioner William Stafford was United States Attorney and petitioner Stuart Carrouth was an Assistant United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida. Guy Goodwin was a…
• United States v. Williams, 612 F.2d 735 (3d Cir. 1979)
  …or a new trial. . The numbers in parenthesis refer to the pages of the appellate record where the cited language appears. . We note that argument was had before the Court in early October, 1979, on a pair of consolidated cases, Payton v. New York, 439 U.S. 1113, 99 S.Ct. 1014, 59 L.Ed.2d 71, and Riddick v. New York, 440 U.S. 934, 99 S.Ct. 1276, 59 L.Ed.2d 492, which squarely raised this issue. . Erb states that “we must look to all the facts and circumstances in order to ascertain the reasonableness of th…
• Mack v. The United States, 635 F.2d 828 (Ct. Cl. 1980)
  …18, 642, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 1335, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969); Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 499, 74 S.Ct. 693, 694, 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954). . Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U.S. 61, 78, 31 S.Ct. 337, 340, 55 L.Ed. 369 (1911). . Davis v. Passman, 439 U.S. 1113, 99 S.Ct. 1014, 59 L.Ed.2d 71 (1979). . Walton v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 755, 757 (1977); Muehlen v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 690 (1976). . The policy memorandum dated Mar. 28, 1972, in part states: “6. Separate applicant supply files will be…