BONANNO

v.

UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES V. ADDONIZIO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United Steelworkers of Am. v. Weber, 443 U.S. 193 (U.S. 1979)
  …at all employment preferences based upon race, including those preferences incidental to bona fide affirmative action plans, violated Title VII's prohibition against racial discrimination in employment. 563 F. 2d 216 (1977). We granted certiorari. 439 U. S. 1045 (1978). We reverse. II We emphasize at the outset the narrowness of our inquiry. Since the Kaiser-USWA plan does not involve state action, this case does not present an alleged violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.…
• United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178 (U.S. 1979)
  …lding that § 2255 does not give district courts this type of resentenc-ing authority,6 we granted the Government’s petition for cer-tiorari in Addonizio’s case and in the consolidated case of two other prisoners in which similar relief was granted.7 439 U. S. 1045. [*184] II We decide only the jurisdictional issue. We do not consider the Government’s alternative argument that the significance of the changes in the Parole Commission’s procedures has been exaggerated because it always attached some weight to t…
• Dunn v. United States, 442 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1979)
  …is false. But, in the court’s view, petitioner’s unequivocal concession at the October hearing that he had testified falsely before the grand jury justified the Government’s reliance on that testimony. 577 F. 2d, at 125-126. We granted certiorari, 439 U. S. 1045 (1978). Because we disagree with the Court of Appeals’ ultimate disposition of the ancillary-proceeding issue, we reverse without reaching the question whether petitioner’s immunized testimony was admissible to prove a violation of § 1623. II A va…