INDEPENDENT COSMETIC MANUFACTURERS & DISTRIBUTORS, INC.

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (72 total)

• Proffitt v. Louie L. Wainwright, 685 F.2d 1227 (11th Cir. 1982)
  …rovenzano, 620 F. 2d 985 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 899, 101 S.Ct. 267, 66 L.Ed.2d 129 (1980) (no right of presence at conference that concerned solely questions of law); United States v. Walls, 577 F. 2d 690, 697-98 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893, 99 S.Ct. 251, 58 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978) (absence of defendant at in-chambers conference between juror and judge, where both counsel present, not critical). . We do not suggest that the jury’s function under Florida’s capital sentencing procedures is s…
• City OF Rochester v. Langhorne M. Bond, 603 F.2d 927 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
  …eview may evidence a special concern of Congress that district court jurisdiction be preserved under certain circumstances. See Indep. Cosmet [*932] ic Mfrs. v. U. S. Dept, of HEW, 187 U.S.App. D.C. 342, 361-362, 574 F. 2d 553, 571-73, cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893, 99 S.Ct. 250, 58 L.Ed.2d 238 (1978) (Wilkey, J., dissenting) (saving clause preserved district court jurisdiction where agency record is insufficient for court of appeals review under “substantial evidence” standard). . 47 U.S.C. § 402(b)(6) (1976…
• United States v. Ford, 632 F.2d 1354 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …. ” See Rogers v. United States, 422 U.S. 35, 38, 95 S.Ct. 2091, 2094, 45 L.Ed.2d 1 (1975); Shields v. United States, 273 U.S. 583, 588-89, 47 S.Ct. 478, 479, 71 L.Ed. 787 (1927); United States v. Walls, 577 F. 2d 690, 698 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893, 99 S.Ct. 251, 58 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978). This rule, however, is not absolute. Polizzi v. United States, 550 F. 2d 1133, 1137 (9th Cir. 1976). A defendant may not complain of proceedings held while he was voluntarily absent, Fed.R.Crim.P. 43(b)(1); Unit…

  ← 1 / 2 →