METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING AGENCY

v.

SOUTH CENTRAL BELL TELEPHONE CO. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Tsavaris, 382 So. 2d 56 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …e. The Supreme Court has cited that decision with approval. Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 96 S.Ct. 1569, 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976). Recently, in Hynes v. Moskowitz, 44 N.Y.2d 383, 406 N.Y.S.2d 1, 377 N.E. 2d 446 (Ct.App.1978), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 888, 99 S.Ct. 243, 58 L.Ed.2d 234 (1978), the Court of Appeals of New York had occasion to consider a Fourth Amendment argument directed to a subpoena duces tecum issued by a grand jury. The court said: All that is required under the State and Federal…
• Zellmer Fromm and Marilyn Tucker v. Rosewell, 771 F.2d 1089 (7th Cir. 1985)
  …514, 101 S.Ct. 1221, 1229, 67 L.Ed.2d 464 (1981). The “certificate of error” procedure provides an alternate method of challenging taxes. See Chicago Sheraton Corp. v. Zaban, 71 Ill.2d 85, 15 Ill.Dec. 634, 373 N.E. 2d 1318, 1321, appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 888, 99 S.Ct. 602, 58 L.Ed.2d 672 (1978). This procedure provides: In counties containing 1,000,000 or more inhabitants, if, at any time before judgment is rendered in any proceeding to collect or to enjoin the collection of taxes based upon any assess…