MARSHALL, SECRETARY OF LABOR

v.

DANIEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By

• Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (U.S. 1982)
  …46 (App. Div. 1978); In re J. A., 283 N. W. 2d 83, 92 (N. D. 1979); In re Darren Todd H., 615 P. 2d 287, 289 (Okla. 1980); In re William L., 477 Pa. 322, 332, 383 A. 2d 1228, 1233, cert. denied sub nom. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children’s Services, 439 U. S. 880 (1978); In re G. M., 596 S. W. 2d 846, 847 (Tex. 1980); In re Pitts, 535 P. 2d 1244, 1248 (Utah 1975); In re Maria, 15 V. I. 368, 384 (1978); In re Sego, 82 Wash. 2d 736, 739, 513 P. 2d 831, 833 (1973) (“clear, cogent, and convincing evidence”); In…
• Lehman v. Lycoming Cnty. Child's. Servs. Agency, 458 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1982)
  …viding minimal care, control and supervision for the three children. Her incapacity cannot and will not be remedied.” In re William L., 477 Pa. 322, 345, 383 A. 2d 1228, 1239-1240, cert. denied sub nom. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children’s Services, 439 U. S. 880 (1978). On such a record, I believe that the District Court could have found, as a discretionary matter, that petitioner had not made a sufficient showing that she acted in the interests of the children to warrant issuing her the writ as their “nex…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Apple Computer, Inc. v. Franklin Computer Corp., 714 F.2d 1240 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …on reflected in the patent and copyright laws”. Herbert Rosenthal Jewelry Corp. v. Kalpakian, 446 F. 2d 738, 742 (9th Cir.1971). As we stated in Franklin Mint Corp. v. National Wildlife Art Exchange, Inc., 575 F. 2d 62, 64 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 880, 99 S.Ct. 217, 58 L.Ed.2d 193 (1978), “Unlike a patent, a copyright protects originality rather than novelty or invention.” In that opinion, we quoted approvingly the following passage from Dymow v. Bolton, 11 F. 2d 690, 691 (2d Cir.1926): Just as…