THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE DIOCESE OF FLORIDA, A NONPROFIT CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
THE TALLAHASSEE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, GUARDIAN OF THE ESTATE OF MAUDE E. LOMAS, AN INCOMPETENT, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1968-02-06
No. J-207
RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
206 So. 2d 400 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1968) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Tallahassee Bank and Trust Company v. Brooks, 200 So.2d 251 (Fla.App. 1st, 1967).

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gen. Cap. Corp. v. TEL Serv. Co., Inc., 212 So. 2d 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968)
    …ber Company, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 311; Tiernan v. Sheldon, Fla.App.1966, 191 So. 2d 87; Sheldon v. Tiernan, Fla.1967, 200 So. 2d 183; Argenbright v. J. M. Fields Co., Fla.App.1967, 196 So. 2d 190; and Walker v. Narose Bldgs., Inc., Fla.App.1968, 206 So. 2d 400. We can conclude this part of the opinion by restating the language of Judge Allen of this Court in Cutri Enterprises, Inc. v. Pan American Bank of Miami, Fla.App. [*379] 1959, 115 So. 2d 592, a usury case, as follows: “We have studied this volumi…
  • Friedman v. U.S. Home Corp., 452 So. 2d 1111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
    …at defendants’ proposed repairs were not a reasonable exercise of their option under the homeowners warranty. The final judgment of the trial court comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness. See Walker v. Narose Buildings, Inc., 206 So. 2d 400 (Fla. 2d DCA), cert. denied, 212 So. 2d 871 (Fla.1968). The lower court’s findings and con- [*1113] elusions will not be disturbed where there is competent, substantial evidence to support such findings and conclusions. In re Estate of Rodgers, 149…
  • The Ohio Cas. Grp. v. Parrish, 260 So. 2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …reement to that procedure. Appellant is now estopped to change its position simply because it is dissatisfied with the result. See Jones v. Life Insurance Company of Florida, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 889; Walker v. Narose Bldgs., Inc., Fla.App.1968, 206 So. 2d 400. [*551] Appellant’s second and third points essentially question the amount of the apportionment. No error is shown. See Hardware Mutual Insurance Company v. Roth, Fla.App.1969, 222 So. 2d 768. Affirmed.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw