LAFONTAINE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Leesona Corp. v. The United States, 599 F.2d 958 (Ct. Cl. 1979)
  …injury began when the contract was awarded, not, as defendant contended, as each shipment of batteries was made. Utilizing the [*966] approach taken in Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F. 2d 1106, 1120-24, 212 Ct.Cl. 168, 193-97 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051, 98 S.Ct. 903, 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978), the interest rate for delay compensation was determined on the basis of the yield of long-run AAA corporate bonds. Finally, the trial judge determined that this case was an exceptional one warranting the award…
• Roche Prods., Inc. v. Bolar Pharm. Co., Inc., 733 F.2d 858 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …, they nevertheless convincingly lead to the conclusion that the word “use” in section 271(a) has never been taken to its utmost possible scope. See, e.g., Pitcairn v. United States, 547 F. 2d 1106, 212 Ct.Cl. 168, 192 USPQ 612 (1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051, 98 S.Ct. 903, 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978) (experimental use may be a defense to infringement); United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241, 62 S.Ct. 1088, 86 L.Ed. 1408 (1942) (“An incident to the purchase of any article, whether patented or unpatente…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Amstar Corp. & Enviro-Clear Co., Inc. v. Envirotech Corp. & Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc., 823 F.2d 1538 (Fed. Cir. 1987)
  …whether the article is similar in structure and in mode of operation to the items found to infringe in the liability phase.”); Pitcairn v. United States, 212 Ct.Cl. 168, 547 F. 2d 1106, 1114, 192 U.S.P.Q. 612, 615 (1976) (per curiam), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1051, 98 S.Ct. 903, 54 L.Ed.2d 804 (1978); Fauber v. United States, 112 Ct.Cl. 302, 81 F.Supp. 218, 220, 79 U.S.P.Q. 410, 418 (1948), cert. denied, 337 U.S. 906, 69 S.Ct. 1048, 93 L.Ed. 1719 (1949); Marconi Wireless Tel. Co. v. United States, 99 Ct.Cl. 1…