QUERN, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
v.
MANDLEY ET AL.; AND CALIFANO, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE V. MANDLEY ET AL.
QUERN, DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID OF ILLINOIS, ET AL.
MANDLEY ET AL.; AND CALIFANO, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE V. MANDLEY ET AL.
434 U.S. 901
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs. of the City of N.Y., 436 U.S. 658 (U.S. 1978)…amendments to the Constitution, whichever is applicable, and will continue to be in compliance with the requirements thereof.” Whether Congress’ attempt is in fact effective is the subject of Hutto v. Finney, O. T. 1977, No. 76-1660, cert. granted, 434 U. S. 901, and therefore we express no view on it here. We note, however, that Mr. Justice Harlan’s test has not been expressly adopted by this Court. Moreover, that test is based on two factors: stare decisis and “indications of congressional acceptance of…
-
Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 (U.S. 1978)…isolation; and (2) an award of attorney’s fees to be paid out of Department of Correction funds. The Court of [*681] Appeals affirmed and assessed an additional attorney’s fee to cover services on appeal. 548 F. 2d 740 (1977). We granted certiorari, 434 U. S. 901, and now affirm. This litigation began in 1969; it is a sequel to two earlier cases holding that conditions in the Arkansas prison system violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.2 Only a brief summary of the facts is necessary to explain the…
-
Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. Sloan, 436 U.S. 103 (U.S. 1978)…over a year. The Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that such a series of suspensions was beyond the scope of the Commission's statutory authority. 547 F. 2d 152, 157-158 (1976). We granted certiorari to consider this important question, 434 U. S. 901 (1977), and, finding ourselves in basic agreement with the Court of Appeals, we affirm. We hold that even though there be a periodic redetermination of whether such action is required by “the public interest” and for “the protection of investors,”…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence