BENNETT

v.

DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR NORTH CAROLINA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• Grubbs v. State, 373 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1979)
  …seizures merely by assuming the status of a probationer, Croteau v. State, 334 So. 2d 577 (Fla.1976), nor does the probationer totally lose his fifth amendment privilege against self-incrimination, State v. Heath, 343 So. 2d 13 (Fla.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 893, 98 S.Ct. 269, 54 L.Ed.2d 179 (1977). By reason of the probationer’s status, however, these rights are qualified rights. An illustration is the distinction that has developed in the application of the exclusionary rule in federal proceedings to ev…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Hicks v. State, 452 So. 2d 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
  …oner’s protection against self-incrimination where, as below, a revocation hearing is conducted prior to the disposition of criminal charges forming the basis of the affidavit of violation. See State v. Heath, 343 So. 2d 13 (Fla.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 893, 98 S.Ct. 269, 54 L.Ed.2d 179 (1977). As to the Supreme Court’s concern with cost, we observe that counsel must be appointed for sentencing in all events and that a per se rule tends to reduce uncertainty and enhance consistency, all of which decrea…
• Cassamassima v. State, 657 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …d to require the defendant to answer whether he had such contact.8 As Judge Harris points out in his concurring opinion, this appears to be what the Florida Supreme Court was alluding to in State v. Heath, 343 So. 2d 13, 16 (Fla.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 893, 98 S.Ct. 269, 54 L.Ed.2d 179 (Fla.1977). As the Heath court said, a probationer may be required to provide all necessary information for his supervision. He may be required to confirm or deny his location at a particular place at a particular time,…