STENCEL AERO ENGINEERING CORP.
v.
UNITED STATES
STENCEL AERO ENGINEERING CORP.
UNITED STATES
434 U.S. 882
Supreme Court of the United States (1977)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard Sys. R.R., Inc. v. Anthony J. Clemente as Dir. of the Dep't of Env't Res. Mgmt., 467 So. 2d 348 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…nce is not unconstitutional for two reasons. .First, because this provision is not a criminal law, it does not fall within the prohibition against ex post facto laws. See Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344, reh’g denied, 434 U.S. 882, 98 S.Ct. 246, 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977). Second, the due process clause does not bar retroactive application of civil legislation unless it operates to create new rights or to destroy vested rights, City of North Bay Village; City of Lakeland, or its c…
-
Frederick v. State, 379 So. 2d 693 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. See: Dobbert v. State, 328 So. 2d 433 (Fla.1976), aff’d 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344 (1977), rehearing den. 434 U.S. 882, 98 S.Ct. 246, 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977). AFFIRMED. BERANEK, HERSEY and GLICK-STEIN, JJ., concur.…
-
Burrell v. State, 483 So. 2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)…v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 29, 101 S.Ct. 960, 964, 67 L.Ed.2d 17, 23 (1981). A law which makes an ameliorating change in an offender’s circumstances is not ex post facto. Dobbert v. Florida, 432 U.S. 282, 97 S.Ct. 2290, 53 L.Ed.2d 344, reh'g denied, 434 U.S. 882, 98 S.Ct. 246, 54 L.Ed.2d 166 (1977). Specifically included within the guidelines is the provision that defendants, even probation violators, whose crimes occurred before the effective date may nevertheless elect guideline treatment. See, e.g., St…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence