UNITED STATES

v.

MAURO ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• United States v. Grayson, 438 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1978)
  …judge challenged both the applicability of Poteet and the suggestion that the District Court’s approach to Grayson’s sentence was constitutionally impermissible. We granted certiorari to resolve conflicts between holdings of the Courts of Appeals.3 434 U. S. 816 (1977). We reverse. II In Williams v. New York, 337 U. S. 241, 247 (1949), Mr. Justice Black observed that the “prevalent modern philosophy of penology [is] that the punishment should fit the offender and not merely the crime,” and that, according…
• United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313 (U.S. 1978)
  …uding that since “Indian tribal courts and United States district courts are not arms of separate sovereigns,” the Double Jeopardy Clause barred the respondent’s trial. 545 F. 2d 1255, 1258. We granted certiorari to resolve an intercircuit conflict. 434 U. S. 816.6 II In Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U. S. 121, and Abbate v. United States, 359 U. S. 187, this Court reaffirmed the well-established [*317] principle that a federal prosecution does not bar a subsequent state prosecution of the same person for the s…
• United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1978)
  …eement. Ridgeway v. United States, 558 F. 2d 357 (CA6 1977), cert. pending, No. 77-5252; United States v. Kenaan, 557 F. 2d 912 (CA1 1977), cert. pending, No. 77-206; United States v. Scallion, 548 F. 2d 1168 (CA5 1977), cert. pending, No. 76-6559. 434 U. S. 816 (1977). This committee was made up of representatives from the following organizations: Parole and Probation Compact Administrators Association, National Association of Attorneys General, National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws,…