TOIA, ACTING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

v.

KLEIN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Rush v. Savchuk, 444 U.S. 320 (U.S. 1980)
  …ting its residents and providing them with a forum in which to litigate their claims. Rush appealed to this Court. We vacated the judgment and remanded the cause for further consideration in light of [*325] Shaffer v. Heitner, 433 U. S. 186 (1977). 433 U. S. 902 (1977). On remand, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the assertion of quasi in rem jurisdiction through garnishment of an insurer’s obligation to an insured complied with the due process standards enunciated in Shaffer. 272 N. W. 2d 888 (1978)…
• O'Connor v. Lee-Hy Paving Corp. & Davis E. Clem, 579 F.2d 194 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …-60, 6 L.Ed. 289, 292 (Marshall, C. J.). . Some of the appellants argue that the vacating and reminding of Savchuk v. Rush, 245 N.W. 2d 624 (Minn.Sup.Ct.1976), a case upholding a Seider attachment, for further consideration in light of Shaffer, see 433 U.S. 902, 97 S.Ct. 2964 (1977), indicates that the Supreme Court believed that contacts other than those between the plaintiff and the insurer were necessary to sustain jurisdiction. This reads too much into the Court’s action. At most, it was an affirmation…
• The Wichita Bd. OF Trade v. The United States & the Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 706 F.2d 1067 (10th Cir. 1983)
  …(12) —June 26, 1977. Supreme Court vacated Kansas court account and pay order and remanded with directions to remand cause to ICC for further consideration in connection with its reconsideration under the order of the District of Columbia Circuit. 433 U.S. 902, 97 S.Ct. 2964, 53 L.Ed.2d 1087. (13) —August 22, 1977. Kansas court order remanding cause to ICC with no provision for retention of jurisdiction. R. 70. (14) —February 9, 1979. ICC order on remands. 359 I.C.C. 624. Charges held under Supreme Cour…

  ← 1 / 5 →