BIGELOW

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (25 total)

• United States v. Conroy, 589 F.2d 1258 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …t court on the issue, but only by an evenly divided vote, 5 Cir. 1976, 537 F. 2d 227. For present purposes, we assume that the Holmes panel establishes the law of the circuit.5 Compare United States v. Abel, 5 Cir. 1977, 548 F. 2d 591, cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956, 97 S.Ct. 2678, 53 L.Ed.2d 273; United States v. Emery, 1 Cir. 1977, 541 F. 2d 887; United States v. Hufford, 9 Cir. 1976, 539 F. 2d 32, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002, 97 S.Ct. 533, 50 L.Ed.2d 614; United States v. Frazier, 8 [*1264] Cir. 1976, 538 F.…
• United States v. Kragness, 830 F.2d 842 (8th Cir. 1987)
  …use of the word “undenied,” which by itself “carries a strong connotation that somehow the defendant himself has failed to rebut a particular point of evidence,” Unit [*869] ed States v. Sanders, 547 F. 2d 1037, 1042-43 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956, 97 S.Ct. 2679, 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977), even these terms are troublesome where the only source for evidence to. rebut or contradict the point is the defendant. Here, the prosecutor asserted many times in his closing argument that government evidence…
• United States v. Earna Jean Pringle and Harold Elston, 576 F.2d 1114 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …denied, 429 U.S. 1002, 97 S.Ct. 533, 50 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976). Cf. United States v. Cheshire, 569 F. 2d 887, 889 (5th Cir. 1978) (beeper placed on plane justified by owner’s consent); United States v. Abel, 548 F. 2d 591, 592 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 956, 97 S.Ct. 2678, 53 L.Ed.2d 273 (1977) (same); United States v. Tussell, 441 F.Supp. 1092, 1102-1106 (W.D.Pa.1977) (same; pilot’s consent). . Accord, United States v. Carpenter, 403 F.Supp. 361, 363-365 (D.Mass.1975) (district court opinion in a com…