SMITH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• State v. Walker, 429 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …ate a very substantial likelihood of irreparable misidentification); United States v. Massaro, 544 F. 2d 547 (1st Cir.1976) (in-court identification approved when pretrial encounter was accidental and without suggestive circumstances), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1052, 97 S.Ct. 766, 50 L.Ed.2d 769 (1977). As I read the record in the case now before us, the trial court had ample evidence to justify its finding that the pretrial encounter was impermissibly suggestive. Consequently, I concur in the court’s opinio…
• Marks v. United States, 430 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1977)
  …(1976). See also United States v. Hill, 500 F. 2d 733 (CA5 1974), cert. denied, 420 U. S. 952 (1975). And the Ninth Circuit, following Hamling, has reached the same result. United States v. Cutting, 538 F. 2d 835 (1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1052 (1977). Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973). Miller held: “The basic guide…
• Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291 (U.S. 1977)
  …s presence on the magazine rack might offend customers. A third juror might try to apply a hybrid standard. See Hamling v. United States, supra, at 142-145 (Brennan, J., dissenting); United States v. McManus, 535 F. 2d 460 (CA8 1976), cert. denied, 429 U. S. 1052. Edelstein & Mott, Collateral Problems in Obscenity Regulation: A Uniform Approach to Prior Restraints, Community Standards and Judgment Preclusion, 7 Seton Hall L. Rev. 543, 566-571 (1976). Rosenblatt & Rosenblatt, Six Member Juries in Criminal Ca…