REESE

v.

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (53 total)

• Hill v. State, 358 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …cedural measure unaffected by inconsistent legislation which did not specifically repeal Rule 3.460 by two-thirds vote of both houses, pursuant to Article Y, Section 2(a), Florida Constitution. In re Connors, 332 So. 2d 336 (Fla.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 999, 97 S.Ct. 525, 50 L.Ed.2d 609 (1976). Connors also reached beyond commitment questions to reassert paramount judicial authority over periodic evaluation and release of Rule 3.460 acquitees. Legislation in 1975 had added Section 394.467(5),11 requir…
• Johnson v. The Honorable Richard Yale Feder, 463 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
  …eets the criteria for involuntary hospitalization. The rule vindicates the committing court’s ability to control the circumstances surrounding the release from custody of an insanity acquittee. See In re Connors, 332 So. 2d 336 (Fla.), cert, denied, 429 U.S. 999, 97 S.Ct. 525, 50 L.Ed.2d 609 (1976); see also Hill v. State, 358 So. 2d 190, 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). The rule also serves to protect the public from an inadvertent administrative release of an insanity acquit-tee.2 We certify that our decision is…
• Lake Country Ests., Inc. v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 440 U.S. 391 (U.S. 1979)
  …in part on the federal Speech or Debate Clause), and the controversy on this point remains a live one. See United States v. Craig, 528 F. 2d 773, 776 (CA7), opinion on rehearing en banc, 537 F. 2d 957, cert. denied sub nom. Markert v. United States, 429 U. S. 999 (1976). Because the issue of application of the Clause to state legislatures (as distinguished from TRPA) is not presented here, I would not decide it with a passing fiat.…