REINHART

v.

PENNSYLVANIA

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …itial misapprehension of the import of the August 25 order might not alone rise to the level of excusable neglect, see Wansor v. George Hantscho Co., 570 F. 2d at 1207; Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 534 F. 2d 404, 411 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 886, 97 S.Ct. 238, 50 L.Ed.2d 167 (1976) (“mere palpable mistake by experienced counsel” is not excusable neglect), we cannot say that an extension of time is unwarranted when counsel is misled by good faith reliance on a statement of the district court…
• Elfman Motors, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 567 F.2d 1252 (3d Cir. 1977)
  …to review other judgments or portions thereof not so specified or otherwise fairly to be inferred from the notice as intended to be presented for review on the appeal. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 534 F. 2d 404, 410 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 886, 97 S.Ct. 238, 50 L.Ed.2d 167 (1976); Bach v. Coughlin, 508 F. 2d 303, 306-307 (7th Cir. 1974); Donovan v. Esso Shipping Company, 259 F. 2d 65 (3d Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907, 79 S.Ct. 583, 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Carter v. Powell, 104 F. 2…
• de Quinonez v. Honorable Julio Cesar Perez, 596 F.2d 486 (1st Cir. 1979)
  …the court with the text of a controlling amendment, particularly one to which we have no ready access except through the parties, this is not excusable neglect. Cf. Spound v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 1 Cir., 1976, 534 F. 2d 404, 411, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 886, 97 S.Ct. 238, 50 L.Ed.2d 167. We find it an intolerable imposition on our time and limited resources to grant a rehearing for the purpose of entertaining arguments addressed to that hitherto undisclosed statute. The case stands on the statute prior…