ALVESTER BRYANT, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ALVESTER BRYANT, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
203 So. 2d 627
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1967)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on the authority of State v. Barton, Fla.1967, 194 So.2d 241, and Taylor v. State, Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 865.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ulvano v. State, 479 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…ot mandatory that the petitioner/defendant be present at either a preliminary hearing or in some instances an evidentiary hearing. Harrell v. State, 458 So. 2d 901 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); Eby v. State, 306 So. 2d 602 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Bryant v. State, 203 So. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967). However, in the instant case the unique facts1 relating to the alleged [*810] conflict of interest compels us to find that the court erred in not appointing counsel and having the appellant at the evidentiary hearing. We therefor…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Barton, 194 So. 2d 241 (Fla. 1967)
- Otice Moore Taylor v. State, 183 So. 2d 865 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)