CACACE
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1976-10-04
No. 75-6713
429 U.S. 841 Supreme Court of the United States (1976) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Hancho C. KIM, 595 F.2d 755 (D.C. Cir. 1979)
    …rosecutor’s comment is at worst a vague reference to defendant’s failure to testify, such an instruction is sufficient to remove any possible prejudice. As the Third Circuit stated in United States v. Adamo, 534 F. 2d 81, 40 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 841, 97 S.Ct. 116, 50 L.Ed.2d 110 (1976), “[w]e believe that the jury in all probability did not understand the Government to be commenting on [the defendant’s] failure to testify, but that, if it did, the judge’s instructions were sufficient to cure th…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw