GRUNDY ET AL.

v.

MANCHESTER INSURANCE & INDEMNITY CO.

Citator

Cited By (55 total)

• Loyce E. Hayes v. Dep't OF THE Navy, 727 F.2d 1535 (Fed. Cir. 1984)
  …States, 530 F. 2d 1387, 209 Ct.Cl. 192 (1976); Barron v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 408-81 (order, July 23, 1982); Swanson v. United States, 218 Ct.Cl. 755 (1978). See also Wathen v. United States, 527 F. 2d 1191, 208 Ct.Cl. 342 (1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 821, 97 S.Ct. 69, 50 L.Ed.2d 82 (1976). . Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); Diggin v. United States, 661 F. 2d 174, 228 Ct.Cl. 578 (1981); Brewer v. United States, 647 F. 2d at 1097-98; Duvall v. United States,…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Grammatikos, 633 F.2d 1013 (2d Cir. 1980)
  …conviction were based on that testimony. The Boston DEA tapes were Rule 16-Jencks Act material which the government had an obligation to make available to the defense. See United States v. Miranda, 526 F. 2d 1319, 1327 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 821, 97 S.Ct. 69, 50 L.Ed.2d 82 (1976); Fed.R.Crim.P. 16; Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500. As we said in United States v. Bufalino, 576 F. 2d 446, 449 (2d Cir.) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 928, 99 S.Ct. 314, 58 L.Ed.2d 321 (1978): [*1026] Wh…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Toney, 598 F.2d 1349 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …18 U.S.C. § 1341:2 (1) The accused must be proved to have participated in a “scheme or artifice to defraud,” see Pereira v. U. S., 347 U.S. 1, 8, 74 S.Ct. 358, 362, 98 L.Ed. 435, 444 (1954); U. S. v. Perkal, 530 F. 2d 604, 605-06 (CA4) cert. denied, 429 U.S. 821, 97 S.Ct. 70, 50 L.Ed.2d 82 (1976). (2) The defendant must “cause” a use of the mails, id., (3) which use of the mails must be “for the purpose of executing the scheme.” Kann v. U. S., 323 U.S. 88, 94, 65 S.Ct. 148, 151, 89 L.Ed. 88, 95 (1944); see…

  ← 1 / 3 →