SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.
v.
PALMORE ET AL.; AND SWAIN, REFORMATORY SUPERINTENDENT V. PRESSLEY
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.
PALMORE ET AL.; AND SWAIN, REFORMATORY SUPERINTENDENT V. PRESSLEY
426 U.S. 932
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Huntley v. Dep't OF Health, 550 F.2d 290 (5th Cir. 1977)…rt has no jurisdiction over a cause of action in which the discriminatory acts occurred before that date.” The Government cited Place v. Weinberger, 497 F. 2d 412 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1040, 95 S.Ct. 526, 42 L.Ed.2d 316 (1974), vacated, 426 U.S. 932, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 49 L.Ed.2d 383 (1976), for this proposition, but acknowledge that “the courts are divided on this question.” The retroactivity question, however, has recently been decided in this Circuit. In Eastland v. Tennessee Valley Authority,…
-
Smith E. Carreathers v. Alexander, 587 F.2d 1046 (10th Cir. 1978)…95 in attorneys’ fees was not an abuse of discretion. The judgment of the district court is reversed in part, affirmed in part, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the views expressed herein. . Place v. Weinberger, 426 U.S. 932, 96 S.Ct. 2643, 49 L.Ed.2d 383 (1976); Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 824, 96 S.Ct. 1961, 48 L.Ed.2d 402 n. 4 (1976), affg 507 F. 2d 1300 (2d Cir. 1974); Mahroon v. Hook, 563 F. 2d 1369 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 2234, 56 L.E…