BUGLIARELLI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Baldarrama, 566 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …e evidence of a prior conviction to show an intent to conspire if the defendant merely pleads not guilty. Cf. United States v. Impson, 5 Cir., 1977, 562 F. 2d 970, 971 n.3; United States v. Urdiales, 5 Cir., 1975, 523 F. 2d 1245, 1247, cert. denied, 426 U.S. 920, 96 S.Ct. 2625, 49 L.Ed.2d 373 (1976) (noting but not deciding the issue). We need not decide this question, as the rationale for disallowing such evidence does not apply if the prior conduct is used to show identity. Unlike intent, identity is unqu…
• Meridian Wood Prods. Co., Inc. v. United States, 725 F.2d 1183 (9th Cir. 1984)
  …ubstantiation of an element of section 274(d) (date, place, amount, business purpose, and business relationship), the deduction for entertainment expenses is to be disallowed. Dowell v. United States, 522 F. 2d 708, 714 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 920, 96 S.Ct. 2626, 49 L.Ed.2d 374 (1976). See also Berkley Machine Works & Foundry Co. v. Commissioner, 623 F. 2d 898, 906 (4th Cir.), (same) cert. denied 449 U.S. 919, 101 S.Ct. 317, 66 L.Ed.2d 147 (1980); Lewis v. Commissioner, 560 F. 2d 973, 977 [*1…
• DeCOSTA v. Viacom Int'l, Inc., 981 F.2d 602 (1st Cir. 1992)
  …e parties’ uses, a prior finding of no likelihood of confusion will not always bar a subsequent action if circumstances of the parties’ uses change. See Sarah Coventry, Inc. v. T. Sardelli & Sons, Inc., 526 F. 2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1975), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 920, 96 S.Ct. 2626, 49 L.Ed.2d 374 (1976). The problem for De-Costa is that his evidence does not show a significant change. And, in any event, that change would do a plaintiff no good where it consists of his expansion into a field where the record of…