ERNST & ERNST

v.

HOCHFELDER ET AL.; BUSH V. UNITED STATES; GRIFFIN V. VICTOR ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• H. L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1981)
  …renthood [*436] of Central Mo. v. Danforth, 428 U. S. 52 (1976); Bellotti v. Baird, 443 U. S. 622, 639 (1979) (Bellotti II) (Powell, J.); id., at 653 (Stevens, J.); T. H. v. Jones, 425 F. Supp. 873, 881 (Utah 1975), summarily aff’d on other grounds, 425 U. S. 986 (1976). Indeed, because an unwanted pregnancy is probably more of a crisis for a minor than for an adult, as the abortion decision cannot be postponed until her majority, “there are few situations in which denying a minor the right to make an impo…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Federman v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 597 F.2d 798 (2d Cir. 1979)
  …e the evils created by: short-swing trading by insiders, the lack of accurate information, loose margin requirements, and fraudulent market manipulation. See Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 96 S.Ct. 1375, 47 L.Ed.2d 668, rehearing denied, 425 U.S. 986, 96 S.Ct. 2194, 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976); Affiliated Ute Citizens v. United States, 406 U.S. 128, 92 S.Ct. 1456, 31 L.Ed.2d 741, rehearing denied, 407 U.S. 916, 92 S.Ct. 2430, 32 L.Ed.2d 692 (1972); Superintendent of Insurance v. Bankers Life and Casua…
• Gochnauer v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., 810 F.2d 1042 (11th Cir. 1987)
  …rrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Byrne, 320 So. 2d 436, (Fla. D.C.A. 3d 1975) (negligence satisfies scienter requirements under Florida law) with Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder, 425 U.S. 185, 201 96 S.Ct. 1375, 1385, 47 L.Ed.2d 668, reh’g denied, 425 U.S. 986, 96. S.Ct. 2194, 48 L.Ed.2d 811 (1976) (element of scienter “cannot be read [*1047] to impose liability for negligent conduct alone”); Rolf v. Blyth, Eastman Dillon & Co., 570 F. 2d 38, 44 (2nd Cir.1978) (reckless disregard supports action under Rul…