CITY OF EUCLID
v.
ROYAL AMERICAN CORP. ET AL.
CITY OF EUCLID
ROYAL AMERICAN CORP. ET AL.
425 U.S. 966
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sedgwick v. Superior Court FOR the Dist. OF Columbia, 584 F.2d 1044 (D.C. Cir. 1978)…ictment. The District of Columbia Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the government had not violated Brady and that a new trial was not barred by the Double Jeopardy Clause. United States v. Sedgwick, 345 A. 2d 465 (D.C.App.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 966, 96 S.Ct. 1751, 48 L.Ed.2d 210 (1976). It found the undisclosed information mere “street rumor” and not properly Brady material. The Double Jeopardy Clause gives the defendant a “valued right to have his trial completed by a particular tribunal.”6…