KEHOE

v.

UNITED STATES; SANDERS V. GEORGIA; HOWELL V. JONES, SHERIFF; HUSTON V. CALIFORNIA; RANSOM V. UNITED STATES; CHATMAN V. UNITED STATES; THOMAS V. SAVAGE, WARDEN; DAWN, DBA GAME CO. V. STERLING DRUG, INC., ET AL.; DINSIO V. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; GIESE V. HOLT, RINEHART & WINSTON, INC., ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. PHILLIPS ET AL., U. S. CIRCUIT JUDGES; THRASHER V. CALIFORNIA ADULT AUTHORITY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Sanabria, 548 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976)
  …is defense on the merits pre-trial, has a right under the double jeopardy clause not to be prosecuted again. Compare United States v. Kehoe, 5th Cir., 516 F. 2d 78, rehearing and rehearing en banc denied, 521 F. 2d 815 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1687, 48 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976) with United States v. Lucido, 517 F. 2d 1 (6th Cir. 1975) and People v. Brown, 40 N.Y.2d 381, 386 N.Y.S.2d 848, 353 N.E. 2d 811 (1976), petition for cert. filed, 45 U.S.L.W. 3317 (Oct. 4, 1976). What is involve…
• Howell v. Thomas, 566 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …ed to defend him. This Court examined the case and denied relief in a former appeal from a denial of a 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 petition. Howell v. Jones, 516 F. 2d 53 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 916, 96 S.Ct. 1116, 47 L.Ed.2d 321 reh. denied, 425 U.S. 945, 96 S.Ct. 1687, 48 L.Ed.2d 189 (1976). The issues presented here have not been presented to the state courts. The district court ruled that “requiring Howell to resort to State procedures would deny him any effective relief. The requirement of exh…