NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN, INC., ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES ET AL.; AND HARRIS ET AL. V. ALLEGHENY-LUDLUM INDUSTRIES, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (211 total)

• United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. 1981)
  …wo statutes which govern recusal of federal district judges on the grounds of bias, prejudice, or lack of impartiality. 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 144 and 455.35 In Davis v. Board of School Comm’rs of Mobile County, 517 F. 2d 1044 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944, 96 S.Ct. 1685, 48 L.Ed.2d 188 (1976), this Court held that the purpose of both disqualification statutes is to guard against personal, extrajudicial bias or the appearance of partiality arising out of such bias. Construing §§ 144 and 455 in pari m…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Edmonds v. Compagnie Generale Transatlantique, 443 U.S. 256 (U.S. 1979)
  …cyrus-Erie Co., 579 F. 2d 714, 725 (CA2 1978); Samuels v. Empresa Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 573 F. 2d 884, 887-889 (CA5 1978), cert. pending, No. 78-795; Dodge v. Mitsui Shintaku Ginko K. K. Tokyo, 528 F. 2d 669, 671-673 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 425 U. S. 944 (1976); Shellman v. United States Lines, Inc., 528 F. 2d 675, 679-680 (CA9 1975), cert. denied, 425 U. S. 936 (1976). See also Cella v. Partenreederei MS Ravenna, 529 F. 2d 15, 20 (CA1 1975) (indicating agreement with Dodge, supra), cert. denied, 42…
• Loranger v. Merrett Stierheim, 10 F.3d 776 (11th Cir. 1994)
  …. In rare cases, we have required recusal when “such pervasive bias and prejudice is shown by otherwise judicial conduct as would constitute bias against a party.” Davis v. Board of Sch. Comm’rs, 517 F. 2d 1044, 1052 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 944, 96 S.Ct. 1685, 48 L.Ed.2d 188 (1976). Ray’s complaints about the trial judge, however, are nothing more than complaints about the judge’s timeliness and rulings. Neither the district judge’s delay, nor his adverse rulings, constitute the sort of…