SMITH

v.

GEORGIA

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Riccobene, 709 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1983)
  …rned. The government analogizes the objection to “invited error,” a doctrine which prohibits a defendant from seeking appellate review of “alleged errors invited or induced by himself,” U.S. v. Lewis, 524 F. 2d 991, 992 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 938, 96 S.Ct. 1673, 48 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976). If the defendants had allowed the special interrogatories, then there would have been no Brown problem presented on appeal. This argument by the government would appear to overlook one critical element. The go…
• United States v. Vicente Meneses-Davila, 580 F.2d 888 (5th Cir. 1978)
  …of a long, 10-day trial, held harmless), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 973, 98 S.Ct. 527, 54 L.Ed.2d 463 (1978). . See United States v. Doran, 564 F. 2d 1176, 1177 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Lewis, 524 F. 2d 991, 992 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 938, 96 S.Ct. 1673, 48 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976); United States v. Taylor, 508 F. 2d 761, 763-764 (5th Cir. 1975). See generally 5 Am. Jur.2d Appeal & Error §§ 713, 717 (1962). . See Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610, 619-620 n. 11, 96 S.Ct. 2240, 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (19…
• United States v. Spiegel, 604 F.2d 961 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …to proceeding with eleven jurors. We would also point out that, if we were to find the dismissal to be error under Smith, we would also be constrained to call it invited error. See United States v. Lewis, 524 F. 2d 991 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 938, 96 S.Ct. 1673, 48 L.Ed.2d 180 (1976). Replacement of Two Jurors with Alternates The government’s voir dire questions failed to inquire whether any on the jury panel knew the defendants or their families. On June 11, 1974, the day after the jury w…