WAGNER
v.
JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY
WAGNER
JUVENILE DEPARTMENT OF MULTNOMAH COUNTY
424 U.S. 924
Supreme Court of the United States (1976)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Chapman v. United States, 547 F.2d 1240 (5th Cir. 1977)
-
Mullen v. Blackburn, 808 F.2d 1143 (5th Cir. 1987)…mplicit claim that information that is incomplete but not false constitutes error of constitutional magnitude. Cf. United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. at 447-48, 92 S.Ct. at 591-92; Thomas v. Savage, 513 F. 2d 536, 538-40 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 924, 96 S.Ct. 1135, 47 L.Ed.2d 333 (1976) (record including prior conviction that is invalid contains error of constitutional magnitude). Mullen’s claim that the use of the presentence investigation report in imposing sentence violated his due process r…
-
Zackary Rogers v. Lynaugh, 848 F.2d 606 (5th Cir. 1988)…e, 642 F. 2d 996, 999 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981); Wilson v. Estelle, 625 F. 2d 1158, 1159-60 (5th Cir. Unit A 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 912, 101 S.Ct. 1985, 68 L.Ed.2d 302 (1981); Thomas v. Savage, 513 F. 2d 536, 539-40 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 924, 96 S.Ct. 1135, 47 L.Ed.2d 333 (1976). Of course, the State may also prove harmlessness beyond a reasonable doubt by showing that the sentencing jury (despite constitutional error) chose the least severe available option. See Mabry v. Klimas, 448 U.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence