MATTHEWS ET UX.

v.

YALE-NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL

Citator

Cited By

• Croft v. Edwards, 353 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)
  …b) have no implied right to maintain an action pursuant to the Act and (c) are not third party beneficiaries under the Act. [*670] Appellees rely heavily on Yale-New Haven Hospital v. Matthews, 32 Conn.Sup. 539, 343 A. 2d 661 (C.P.1974), cert. den., 423 U.S. 1024, 96 S.Ct. 467, 46 L.Ed.2d 398 (1975). Although we are of the view that that case is well reasoned and is clearly supportive of the final judgment here appealed we find it unnecessary to address the point sub judice. A careful examination of appell…
• Bouchillon v. Estelle, 628 F.2d 926 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …the petitioner in a habeas corpus proceeding. Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 226-27, 85 S.Ct. 824, 830, 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965); Rhodes v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1978, 582 F. 2d 972, 973; Banda v. Estelle, 5 Cir., 1975, 519 F. 2d 1057, 1058; cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1024, 96 S.Ct. 467, 46 L.Ed.2d 398 (1975). The district court, considering all the evidence, found that this burden was not met. From our examination of the record of the Texas state habeas proceeding in this case, we cannot say that the district court b…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Guice v. Fortenberry, 633 F.2d 699 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …district court resolved the merits of petitioners’ application for habeas corpus on the basis of the state court record without the necessity of an evidentiary hearing. See, e. g., Banda v. Estelle, 519 F. 2d 1057, 1058 n.l (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1024, 96 S.Ct. 467, 46 L.Ed.2d 398 (1975) (noting that “[wjhere the record of the state habeas proceeding reveals a full and fair hearing on all of the challenges raised in the petition, the district court may proceed to decision without benefit of furth…