MEYERS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Chandris, S.A. v. Basil Yanakakis, 668 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1995)
  …y nonlawyers and gives state and federal courts concurrent jurisdiction over such claims. See Engel v. Davenport, 271 U.S. 33, 37, 46 S.Ct. 410, 412, 70 L.Ed. 813 (1926). In Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Beatty, 400 F.Supp. 234 (S.D.Ill.), aff'd, 423 U.S. 1009, 96 S.Ct. 439, 46 L.Ed.2d 381 (1975), a federal district court upheld the constitutionality of an Illinois court rule limiting the participation of out-of-state attorneys in pending Federal Employers’ Liability Act and Jones Act litigation. Even tho…
• Quincy Corp. v. Aguilar, 704 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997)
  …he union was decertified, was supported by competent substantial evidence. It quoted the Louisiana Supreme Court’s opinion in National Gypsum Co. v. Administrator, Louisiana Department of Employment Security, 313 So. 2d 230, 233 (La.), appeal dism., 423 U.S. 1009, 96 S.Ct. 439, 46 L.Ed.2d 381 (1975): [W]e think the more reasonable interpretation of the disqualification to be that unemployment due to ‘a labor dispute in active progress’ includes only unemployment resulting from labor disputes in which the em…
• Leis v. Flynt, 439 U.S. 438 (U.S. 1979)
  …2d 889 (1958). The third case involved a challenge on substantive due process grounds to a rule of the Supreme Court of Illinois that placed decisions on pro hac vice applications in the trial court’s discretion. Norfolk & Western R. Co. v. Beatty, 423 U. S. 1009, summarily aff’g 400 F. Supp. 234 (SD Ill. 1975). So far as the opinion in the District Court in that case indicates, however, there was no claim that the rule had been applied arbitrarily or discriminatorily.…

  ← 1 / 3 →